tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12001852.post1488172580212202627..comments2023-09-30T08:13:42.027-04:00Comments on Measuring Days: Just once moreJaredhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14065742546421747652noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12001852.post-74892634439790525152008-02-28T08:56:00.000-05:002008-02-28T08:56:00.000-05:00Well played to both of you.Well played to <I>both</I> of you.Micahhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02028085284627739162noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12001852.post-54528196660614907502008-02-27T17:08:00.000-05:002008-02-27T17:08:00.000-05:00Yeah, but. This time he's right. The point in quot...Yeah, but. <BR/><BR/>This time he's right. <BR/><BR/>The point in quoting Calvin is not that he is infallible and that it seals the deal, but that he is (1) highly eloquent and thoroughly biblical and (2) indicative and representative of the reformational understanding, especially within our tradition.Jaredhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14065742546421747652noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12001852.post-50588235099622429372008-02-27T16:31:00.000-05:002008-02-27T16:31:00.000-05:00Jared,Calvin also believed that the Lord’s Day was...Jared,<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://members.iinet.net.au/~jvd/articles/sabbath2.htm" REL="nofollow">Calvin</A> also believed that the Lord’s Day was <B><I>not</I></B> the Christian Sabbath, and that the change from the seventh day (Sabbath) to the eighth day was not ordained by God (He found no Scriptural support for this). I know that you could not believe as Calvin does because it is in direct opposition to the teaching position of the Church, and you could no longer remain as minister in good standing if you did.<BR/><BR/>Point being, and I hate to be the one to say it, but right or wrong, we all cherry pick from writings to support our presuppositions. However, it does not make them true. :>)<BR/><BR/>KurtAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com